Sunday, February 5, 2012

First Activity:

1. The short-haired allele is dominant to the long-haired allele so you couldn't determine the long-haired genotype of a short-haired cat just by looking at it. A heterozygous genotype would override the recessive allele.

2. You could determine the genotype of an Agouti cat by doing a test cross. If it is homozygous dominant than the offspring will all have striped fur. If it is heterozygous than the offspring will be 50% striped and 50% not striped.

3. They want to figure out why and how these genes don't resemble neither homozygotes.

4.  BB x BB= BB, BB, BB, and BB ( 100% of the offspring will be black)

5. Maybe the pattern on its fur can be used as a camouflage, to hide from its predator. And since it can't be seen they could live longer.

6. Yes, because the dominant white allele overrides all of the other pigmentation genes.

7. Some factors that determine allele frequency are eye color and fur color. No, it is not always the most frequent allele at a locus.

8. Their genotype is Tt. And maybe it will increase over time.

Second Activity:

1. The results of both experiments seem to be completely different.

2. Compared to the second experiment, it seems like Mendel's results were probably set up.

Third Activity:

1.a. not possible
   b. either A+, A-, O+, or O-
   c. either A+, A-, AB+, or AB-
   d. either A, AB, B, or O
   e. either A, AB, B, or O
   f. unlikely

2. No, because the child's blood must have some kind of "resemblance" to its' parent's blood




 Partner: Leeanna Singleton

9 comments:

  1. Nice answers! You have very detailed info

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sam, Give more detail in your response. Say what answers were nice and why so she can continue answering in that manner. I have to disagree that her answers were very detailed in the second activity because there were no numbers. Also, you needed one constructive comment AKA something she could do better next time.

      Delete
  2. I have all those answers in my blog in Activity 3!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Elvira, Be sure to give detail in your comments. Say what she did well in those answers because the answer is actually yes. Her explanation doesn't really say why or why not. You also needed to answer something she could do better next time AKA constructive comment.

      Delete
  3. Good answers,though some people may be confused as to what you are talking about,as your answers do not go back to the question you are answering.Try to do that next time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Elvis, Good comment about the connection. Next time tell her why or what about her answers were good so she can repeat next time.

      Delete
  4. Your answers are as wise as an old man's saying.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. zero credit for this comment. Bryant, make sure you give details. You were supposed to write one thing that was done well and one thing that could be better next time and how.

      Delete
  5. Catherine, several of your responses do not directly answer the question asked. The second activity did not give any supporting information to why you believe Mendel used fake data.
    The third activity was answer completely wrong as if you did not read any of the website.

    ReplyDelete